Back to Index
Methodology

How We Score Sovereignty

The Sovereignty Index™ measures sovereignty across 7 weighted dimensions, producing a composite score (0–100) for countries, companies, and platforms. Our methodology is designed to be transparent, reproducible, and aligned with the Society OS thesis: Provable. Portable. Programmable.

Composite Score Formula

Overall Score = Σ (Dimension Score × Weight)

Each dimension is scored 0–100 based on multiple indicators. The weighted sum produces the final composite score. Weights reflect the relative importance of each dimension to holistic sovereignty.

Digital Sovereignty

Weight: 20%

Data ownership, privacy rights, encryption adoption, digital identity control, platform independence

Key Indicators

  • Data protection framework strength
  • End-to-end encryption adoption rates
  • Digital identity sovereignty
  • Cloud data localisation policies
  • Right to data portability enforcement

Financial Sovereignty

Weight: 15%

Currency control, economic independence, decentralised finance adoption, sovereign wealth management

Key Indicators

  • Currency independence & stability
  • Economic diversification index
  • DeFi & alternative financial systems
  • Sovereign wealth fund strength
  • Financial access distribution

Political Sovereignty

Weight: 15%

Governance autonomy, democratic participation, self-determination, institutional independence

Key Indicators

  • Democratic participation rates
  • Governance transparency index
  • Self-determination mechanisms
  • Institutional independence
  • Civil liberties protection

Informational Sovereignty

Weight: 15%

Media independence, information control, censorship resistance, algorithmic transparency

Key Indicators

  • Press freedom & media diversity
  • Information access without surveillance
  • Algorithmic transparency requirements
  • Censorship resistance infrastructure
  • Public access to government data

Spatial Sovereignty

Weight: 10%

Territorial control, resource rights, physical infrastructure, IoT governance

Key Indicators

  • Territorial integrity & control
  • Natural resource sovereignty
  • Infrastructure independence
  • IoT governance frameworks
  • Energy self-sufficiency

IP Sovereignty

Weight: 15%

Patent ownership, innovation rights, knowledge protection, AI training consent

Key Indicators

  • Patent portfolio strength & independence
  • Innovation output per capita
  • AI training consent frameworks
  • Knowledge export protections
  • Creative commons & open IP balance

Collective Sovereignty

Weight: 10%

Community governance, collective action capability, cooperative networks

Key Indicators

  • Community governance structures
  • Collective action infrastructure
  • Cooperative & mutual economy strength
  • Social cohesion metrics
  • Cross-community collaboration

Data Sources

  • • Government transparency portals
  • • Academic research indices (Freedom House, EIU)
  • • Industry reports (patent databases, financial data)
  • • Civil society monitoring (press freedom, digital rights)
  • • Society OS proprietary research

Update Frequency

  • • Monthly score recalculation
  • • Quarterly deep methodology review
  • • Annual weight rebalancing
  • • Event-driven updates for major shifts
  • • Historical data preserved for trend analysis