Back to F-ACT
Competition compliance

Antitrust & competition-compliance note

Standards work brings together organisations that often compete. That is normal and legal — but it comes with ground rules. This note sets the boundary for anyone taking part in F-ACT: the conversation stays on the technical and governance merits of the standard, and never drifts into the things competitors are not allowed to agree on.

What participation looks like

  • Debate the technical and governance content of the standard on its merits.
  • Keep participation open to any organisation willing to abide by the rules.
  • Decide by transparent, documented process, with reasons on the record.
  • Bring competition-law questions to counsel if a discussion strays near the line.

Off the table — always

  • Discuss prices, margins, discounts or any commercial terms of members’ products.
  • Allocate customers, territories or markets between participants.
  • Agree to boycott, exclude or disadvantage any competitor, supplier or implementer.
  • Share competitively sensitive business information under cover of a standards meeting.

Open participation is the safeguard

The strongest protection against a standard being used to shut anyone out is that anyone willing to follow the rules can take part, the specification is free to implement under the royalty-free pledge, and conformance is a matter of public self-declaration in the registry — not a gate controlled by incumbents.

A note, not legal advice

This is a plain-language statement of the ground rules, not legal advice and not a complete account of competition law in any country. If you are unsure whether a discussion is heading somewhere it should not, stop and take it to your own counsel. The rules apply to every meeting, mailing list and channel connected with the standard.

How the standard is governed

The decision process these rules sit inside.

Read the governance